If you've ever gotten a ticket in the mail after allegedly blowing through a red light, a recent Supreme Court ruling should spike your interest.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, a case that dealt with a laboratory analysis in a drug case, may provide some insight. The defendant, Melendez-Diaz, argued that he had the right to question a lab worker who produced a certificate showing that cocaine was recovered at the scene of his arrest.
The high court agreed, ruling that information in lab reports can be used as evidence only if the defendant is given the opportunity to cross-examine the technician who did the testing.
This ruling is now setting precedent for cases involving speed cameras, which rely on certificates to confirm the reliability of each machine's reading.
Until this recent ruling, if you're anything like me, you probably proceed with caution every time you approach a yellow light at a busy intersection. Like me, you've also probably learned to check your surroundings -- making sure there's no camera attached to the traffic light taking photos of alleged driving infractions.
While local governments jumped on the bandwagon prior to the recession, installing speed cameras at high-traffic intersections as a way to generate revenue, the public was advised these new cameras would help reduce the number of law breakers and, more importantly, eliminate (or minimize) accidents in problem areas. According to the Wall Street Journal, one town in Illinois raked in more than $1 million in revenue from citations issued over a three-month period. Now that's a lot of dough.
Fast-forward to an economy in a recession, and metro areas such as Atlanta have halted the use of the traffic cameras, mostly because drivers have become keenly aware of the camera locations and heed the warnings.
Cities are losing money from the lack of citations being issued and the additional expenses incurred to operate the cameras. Are local governments more concerned about cash flow or public safety? And will employees of speed-camera companies be called into court to defend the results of the products they market and manufacture?
Join Jeff Fortson, editor of JeffCars.com, on Saturday mornings for his chat forum. Each week, he answers your car-buying questions live. Drive on over to www.JeffCars.com before you make your next move.




Comments: (14)
Add a comment
By: Soldier4God on 8/09/2009 1:43PM
I Can Testify That The Effect Of Red Light Cameras Have Made Me Paranoid At Intersections. I Have Gotten Tickets In Frisco Texas, And I Cannot Even Afford To Pay Them. Just The Idea Of Getting Another One HAs Me Slamming on Brakes And Being Indecisive As Whether To Accelerate To Make It Through The Caution Lights! THEY ARE DANGEROUS!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Manderlon Brooks on 8/11/2009 1:14PM
I have just recieved my third ticket. I did not violate any of the red lights. I think that someone else in my home (although my son says it was not him) might have done this. There are just the two of us in the home. The cameras might not be working properly. I don't even travel in the areas where they say these violations occurred. I don't have a job and am very frustrated by what is happening to me. Is there anything that we can do about these tickets. Two of the tickets were for turning right on a red light going 12 miles an hour and the second one was for doing the same thing the next day doing 14 miles an hour at the same intersection. I am never up at 9:00 in the morning unless I have class. I am 63 years old and drive very carefully; stopping completely at every light. I do not have any money to pay the tickets or the credit cards I had to pay them with. $300.00 is a lot of money for me with no income and a lot of student loans. I am living with friends right now and just got the third ticket for being in the city of Chicago. I live in the suburbs. What is going on with these cameras and how accurate are they. I think this is just a ploy for cities to make more money off of unsuspecting people. Who out there agrees with me?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Warr4en L. Copeland Jr. on 8/11/2009 9:25PM
I agree with you.
Report This
By: I'm just sayim on 8/11/2009 7:03PM
In NYC, the pictures taken by the cameras are SO DAMM CLEAR, you can see the face of the person driving and the plates, front and back.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: lana on 8/11/2009 10:00PM
These cameras are dangerous for the simple fact that they sometimes cause you to make snap decisions such as do I slam on my break and allow someone to hit me from the back therefore possibly killing or injuring everyone involved or do I go through the light and risk the chance of getting a ticket that I cannot afford.It's unfair and I think they should be taken down especially since there are so many people out here with no jobs to pay for these tickets.If it comes down to whether a mother has to pay for a ticket or feed her child, I'm sure that she is going to feed her child.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: mscp69 on 8/11/2009 11:50PM
i received 2,$ 300.00tickets for parking by my daughters school, where they say i passed a school bus. mind you, school wasnt even out yet! so i fought back and won.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Kathleen Trahan on 8/12/2009 5:18AM
Good for you the next time one of us travel to Houston and get a ticket I'm going to do the same thing even though it going to cost me about the same amount it just the idea of the ticket.
Report This
By: Kathleen Trahan on 8/12/2009 5:19AM
My Husband got a ticket in Houston , TX To this day I swear it was a lie. It looked like something some one could have adjust to there view. I remember the day we was in Houston at that interesection hell what do they want you to do slam brakes and get hit from the rear and pushed into traffic. I don't even what to go back to Houston TX anytime soon that ticket was $70 dollars.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: eddie knight on 8/17/2009 5:35PM
i just got through with court in killeen tx this morning for runing a red light on memorial day my wife and i were together and the light was green all the way through but the video showed it turned yellow then red. and the light was under 3 seconds on the vedio the city attorny said it was at least 4 or 5 judge said i belive the camera not the two of you pay up. a foriegn copany owns and operates the cameras and have been in court for everything from bribery,mail fraud, false documents to you name it but two us citizens are liars.
Report This
By: lawana on 8/16/2009 1:25PM
I agree it is VERY DANGEROUS when approaching a traffic signal with a camera. Stopping extremely fast so you won't get flashed and ticketed, which may cause someone to hit you from behind. Ouch $$$ either way (insurance or a ticket in the mail).
Reply to this Comment | Report This